Not even ten years ago the Executive MBA (EMBA) world was quite different from today. Multi-school, multi-campus programs were rare, their development even endangered when - after the terrorist attacks of September 11 - travelling on international routes became less desirable. Despite those poor beginnings the EMBA programs have grown strongly ever since. The Financial Times reports that between 2001 and 2010 the number of courses in its league table has doubled, from 50 in the original classification to 100 in 2010.
Nowadays it is those multi-campus programs and studying at more than one business school in different countries that are in rising demand. The 2010 Financial Times rating for Executive MBAs has ranked several of those programs highly (see ranking below).
The Executive MBA Programme
Executive MBA programs aim at managers who want to develop their career further. They are similar to traditional MBAs but differ in their schedules, rigidity of curriculum and networking opportunities. Executive MBA students take most classes with the same set of students to be able to establish business contacts with managers at different career levels and from different companies.
The Wall Street Journal Survey 2010 underlined the importance of networking as 35% of the participants said their top reason to do an EMBA was to switch careers or industries. Only 29% said they were seeking a promotion within their current company. Originally, the latter reason has been the main motivation for attending an EMBA programme.
Differences between a "normal" MBA and an EMBA
1. Experience needed: An EMBA targets managers that have been in a supervising role for at least 5 to 10 years. Participants are therefore older and more experienced.
2. More restricted schedule: As the participants are mostly working in managing positions, classes take normally place on weekends and fridays.
3. Corporate Tuition Support: If a company sees enough benefit, it might sponsor a manager's EMBA. This is an important factor as EMBAs can be significantly more expensive than traditional MBA programs.
Top Schools for EMBA programs
In the following list MBA Channel compares the EMBA rankings of the top 10 Executive Programs listed in Business Week, Financial Times and the Wallstreet Journal. Highlighted are the two top performers mentioned in all three publications.
|
Ranking |
Business Week |
Financial Times |
Wallstreet Journal |
|
1 |
Northwestern University (Kellogg), USA |
Joint programme from: Northwestern University (Kellogg), USA Hong Kong UST Business School, China |
University of Pennsylvania (Wharton), USA
|
|
2 |
University of Chicago (Booth), USA |
Joint programme from:
Columbia Business School, USA
London Business School, U.K.
|
Washington University (Olin), USA |
|
3 |
University of Pennsylvania (Wharton), USA
|
Trium - joint programme from:
HEC Paris, France
LSE (London School of Economics and Political Science), U.K.
New York University (Stern), USA
|
Thunderbird School of Global Management, USA |
|
4 |
Columbia Business School, USA
|
Insead, France / Singapore / U.A.E.
|
University of Southern California (Marshall), USA
|
|
5 |
University of Southern California (Marshall), USA
|
University of Chicago (Booth), USA |
Northwestern University (Kellogg), USA
|
|
6 |
IE Business School, Spain
|
London Business School, U.K. |
University of Notre Dame (Mendoza), USA |
|
7 |
University of Michigan (Ross), USA
|
IE Business School, Spain
|
New York University (Stern), USA |
|
8 |
UCLA, USA
|
University of Pennsylvania (Wharton), USA
|
Johnson Cornell University, USA |
|
9 |
Southern Methodist University (Cox), USA
|
Duke University (Fuqua), USA
|
Columbia Business School, USA |
|
10 |
Duke University (Fuqua), USA
|
Chinese University of Hong Kong, China
|
UNC Kenan-Flagler, USA |
Sources: Investopedia, http://www.metronews.ca, Wall Street Journal, Business Week, Financial Times
-
Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania
Full-Time MBA, Executive MBA -
Kellogg School of Management
Full-Time MBA



