News » Latest News » Business Schools » The Market » Business School News » Orientations » Article
IIPM: For a handful of dollars
News Bärbel Schwertfeger - 07.07.2009
The Indian Institute of Planning and Management (IIPM) boasts being India’s best business school and has been saying it cooperates with several renowned schools in Europe and the US for years – which is often false information. But although its unserious business practices are known, some renowned business schools nonetheless cooperate with the controversial Indian school.
"IIPM – Best only in Claims" was the recent article headline from the Indian career magazine Careers360 that illuminated the strange business practices of the IIPM in detail, including the false information about partner schools. (Source: Careers360)
In contrast, the largest Indian newspapers have been holding back on critiquing the business school for years. With its entire-page ads, the IIPM is ultimately one of their largest advertising customers. Some renowned publications even get carried away with puff pieces sometimes, which the IIPM proudly displays on its website. It isn’t always recognizable whether the presented articles aren’t really just editorially-constructed advertisement texts.
The IIPM has also been praised by Della Bradshaw, editor for MBA topics and the MBA ranking at the Financial Times (FT). In her "The Maverick Management Guru" article (published in 2006), Bradshaw notably wrote uncritically about the founder “Honorary Dean” Arindam Chaudhuri and his, according to him, largest business school in the world.
It would’ve already been logical to scrutinize the supposed success story. Indian IIPM grads receive their MBA degree, for example, from the International Management Institute (IMI) in Brussels, which is unknown and not accredited in Belgium. (Source: www.timi.edu)
The IIPM still uses its coup cleverly today. “IIPM in Financial Times, UK. Feature of the Week. Must read" flashes on the website. The link to the three year-old FT articles follow.
The trick with the partner schools is also old. The Stanford Graduate School of Business significantly distanced itself back in 2007 from the IIPM’s statements that Stanford would offer a certified executive education program with the IIPM. “This claim is false,” wrote Gale Bitter, Associate Dean and Director. “Neither the Stanford Graduate School of Business nor the office of Stanford Executive Education has ties of any kind with the IIPM.” Read statement
Before, in december 2006 the Deputy Director at the Stanford Center for Professional Development, Paul Marca, had already written a letter to the Director of Global Strategy at IIPM, Siddharth Nambiar, in which he has complaint about the misleading advertising und has asked him immediately to cease "any and all uses of Stanford`s name and logo". After Gale Bitter`s statement Siddharth Nambiar complaint to her about the defamation of the good name of the IIPM and referred to some Stanford professors who had taught at IIPM.
And Stanford is hardly an isolated case. The Chicago Booth School of Business recently emerged as a partner as IIPM students were to take part in the Advanced Global Management Program in Chicago. So IIPM announced: "The World´s No.1 Ranked B-School. What makes the program perhaps most unique and distinct from any other similar program in India is the compulsory International Residency Program on Advanced Global Management that the students will undergo at the Graduate School of Business, University Chicago."
Following demand, Chicago reacted immediately and wrote the IIPM on June 23rd: "We kindly ask that all mention of Chicago GSB being a part of this Advanced Global Management program be immediately removed from all pages of IIPM’s sites." "We are really sorry for this," answered Chanda Mehra, Senior Manager of the Global Outreach Program at the IIPM.
The document was changed and now "The World´s No.1 Ranked B-School" practically hangs in an empty space. The following sentence is all that remains: "What makes the program perhaps most unique and distinct from any other similar program in India is the compulsory International Residency Program on Advanced Global Management that the students will undergo." Where the participants will take the program however remains a mystery.
But not every business school is anxious about its reputation. The behavior of the Haas School of Business at the University of California Berkeley is noteworthy. In February the Californian school told the Indian magazine Careers360 that Berkeley doesn’t have anything to do with the IIPM and has already heard that the school is known for announcing false connections with top schools.
But then the press department corrected the answer and explained that there is a new customer relationship between the IIPM and the Center for Executive Education. The first program took place in June. And in May Berkeley answered that the IIPM, as a customer, could call itself a "business school ‘participating’ with the Haas School of Business."
Clearly business schools are looking for cooperation with Indian schools so frantically that they yield their good name, Careers360 commented on the behavior. They put aside their ethical principles and forfeit their professionalism in order to earn a few more dollars.
The document even creates the impression that Berkeley gives credits for the program. Responding to a query by MBA Channel, Berkeley explained on July 2nd: "The Haas School has asked IIPM to take the Haas/UC Berkeley logo off its web site and marketing materials and to correct its language regarding the certificate of completion and the credits. The Center for Executive Education does not offer credits, only a certificate of completion with respect to the segment of the program that it has taught."
The Judge Business School at the University of Cambridge is also mentioned as a “partner B-School.” Clearly it has no qualms about having its logo next to the questionable school. The school offers IIPM participants a five-day executive education program in Cambridge, writes the press office. "IIPM have engaged us to deliver and the first group will commence in July 2009. There are no university qualifications awarded from Cambridge University or Judge Business School. The only certificate is a certificate of attendance which is what we provide to participants on all our programmes."
www.iipm.edu

The Truth About IIPM
Friday, September 16, 2005
The Truth
This has been written as a response after reading a blog-post by Gaurav Sabnis. What follows has been written by an IIPM ex-student as well as ex-employee. Please read it completely and also forward it to as many people as you can so more students and parents are not lotted out of lakhs of rupees and their careers are not ruined by Planman
Thanks for raising this issue. It is indeed a shame how a person with minimal academic qualifications (MA Economics Correspondence Chennai University) has successfully managed to fool so many people with such convincing effect that the self-styled management guru and inventor of the “I Theory”, as he has come to be known, is given more prominence in the media than Cambridge educated PhDs in Economics or Harvard trained MBAs. (Wonder who crowned him “Professor” anyway?) The print media plays a role in this game of deception as it earns huge revenues from IIPM’s advertisements. Thus what you come to know in the Tribune or Times of India is that laptops aredistributed free (which is a blatant lie, as the cost is included in the Rs 7 lac plus fee) and where the students went for the GOTA (a waste of time and money anyway as students learn nothing) and not where they got their jobs and at what compensation. No names of the job recipients are divulged. No text books are given free, unlike other institutes like FORE, TAPMI, Welingkars or IMT Ghaziabad. Students have to depend on handouts and class notes only. Most of them do nothave a clue as to where an idea is taken from. The institute puts an overemphasis on unnecessary or irrelevant course requirements which may or may not be required in the industry as a means of impressing would-be parents and students to cough out the dough needed for a ‘proper management education’ which stresses on ‘MBE course content’. Also the excessive stress on presentations in formal attire, which normally constitutes 40% of the course requirement makes the students plagiarise from B-magazines without gaining any proper perpective. None of what the Chaudhuris preach is original. All of them had been taught before by professors in the IITs, IIMs and IISc long before Arindam packaged it in “Count Your Chickens..”. In the process he made millions.Wonder why no one brought out the charge of plagiarism against them before?
The fuel cost for Arindam Chaudhuri’s Jaguar/ BMW runs into lakhs (even the fuel is imported) per week and the family expenses run into unmentionable amounts. One can shudder in horror. One can imagine the sheer wastage of wealth of the middle class who by way of educating their children spend millions to enrich the coffers of the Chaudhuri family, for little merit of theirs. That IMI, Belgium degrees are of no value in India does not come as a surprise either. People whohave had MBA degrees from IMI who had tried to get admission to universities in India and abroad were told that as IMI degree can be completed three years after 10+2, they would be regarded as BBAs or as undergraduate degree holders. I knew of one who, after coming to the US had to start all over again as a data entry operator (which is what she did in India) and had to re-enroll for another MBA programme at a third grade university (a four year college, incidentally, which offers an MBA course).
The talk of professors from Harvard, Columbia, INSEAD and Yale deserves to be addressed. IIPM paid huge fees to some of these professors to give a one-time guest lecture. What the public will know from the press is that these professors take classes at IIPM which is false. But it should also be mentioned that IIPM does its bit to gather the best of industry and academic brains (from IIT, IIM, IISc., IIFT, FMS, Delhi School of Economics etc.) to take classes on a regular basis.They are regarded as ‘external faculty’. Planman members do the rest.
If there are anything that can be really said good about IIPM, they can be summed up as:
1) development of communication skills
2) presentation skills
3) marketing skills
4) financial problem solving skills and perhaps most importantly
5) personality development and attitude development.
Too bad that segments of the family run Indian industry which is traditionally Lala-company dominated, cannot appreciate these finer aspects. But the Government of India and PSUs send its officers for part time training on deputation. Senior Planman faculty like Vistasp Mallegamwala have trained PSU staff. It is also quite surprising that the only properly trained faculty is the dean A. Sandeep who earned his PGDBM (3 year evening) at IIM Calcutta. The other faculty N Chamoli, Prasoon Majumdar are only MA holders in Economics. Ex-students, they could notclear their MBA degree.
IIPM passouts (“grads”) get jobs as DSAs, data entry operators, sales representatives (A. Sandeep started his career as a sales rep, while doing part time PGDBA at IIMC), financial and insurance agents, space selling agents , multi-level- marketing agents, account executives, and brokers. Most of the rest (provided they have or have developed excellent verbal communication skills in accent-free English, and who are fluent in making presentations with a smattering of knowledge of economics and marketing, which comes in handy) are absorbed by IIPM / Planman as they havenowhere else to go. On joining Planman, they are sworn to secrecy that prohibits them from foreclosing any details. Also they cannot clear their exams even if they want to leave as their contracts are time bound. They can clear their remaining exams only after they have served their terms and have offered their resignations. They cannot apply for jobs that require “post MBA work experience”. And they cannot criticize IIPM ever as that might led to their future careerprospects being jeopardised. Also IIPM alumni are rarely willing to admit that they made a wrong choice as the admission of personal liability points to lapse of judgement on the part of the student. The talk of EQ as being more decisive than the IQ in corporate decisions leads unwary students, into being unwitting followers of the Pied Piper that is the Chaudhuri family. Many alumni after failing to get jobs, and after wasting their parent’s lifetime provident fund /annuity and retirement savings, lose all their face and social standing. Many become nervous wrecks, drug addicts, swindlers, and drug peddlers.
It is also interesting to note how few IMI degrees (which are scraps of paper, useless anyway) are awarded every year. IIPM /Planman have controlling stake in IMI. So IMI cannot terminate its contract with IIPM even if it wanted to. One of the better kept industry secrets is that IIPM has the controlling stake in the Times of India as well. So the Times would never go so far as to criticize it. But Hindustan Times is not obligated to do so. That is why the criticisms of IIPM first appeared in HT.
PLZ READ THIS AND PASS IT TO ALL
I think it is high time that in the general interest of the student community and those interested in the state of education in India, that AICTE, UGC and AIU be given powers to investigate charges of fraud in non-affiliated institutes. Perhaps a CBI investigationagainst IIPM / Planman / Chaudhuri family might be a good way to start. Our student population deserve better than to be regarded as ‘markets’.
Institution like IIpm shuld be banned for ruining the careers of students….... i am an ex iipm passed out i tried to get into teaching profession but every where i go they say tat iipm Mba is not valid…..... neither i can do any further studies….. they have made life of students like us miserable…...... they say about placement. its is all bull shit hardly few companies will come and they boost tat they are best in placement… Mr.Arindam Chaudhuri’s SHOULD BE PUT BEHIND BARS FOR MAKING LIFE MISERABLE FOR PEOPLE LIKE US…...... as my parents have spent half of their savings in mba and i dont knw wat to do now
Undoubtedly the article is lopsided, otherwise why would you critisize every educational institute that had the guts to say that it is associated with IIPM; and is accredidition the most important or Education an institute provides.
For eg. there are probably more than 5000 mba and pgdbms accredited by AICTE and UGC and I can guarantee you the quality of education in 99% of them can’t even be compared with IIPM.
How CAN I claim this….. well Because I AM an ex-IIPMite…. And I was taught by the same proffessors that taught students in IIT Delhi, FMS, IIFT.
Yes, academic merit is probably not the paramount condition while getting admission there but, also cant justify the claims of being the biggest B-school on earth but yes it is the BEST MBA MONEY can buy in India.( the trick is what you do with that education)
I cant certify every claim that IIPM makes in newspapers but i can certify that I have attended exclusive lectures of Dr. Philip Kotler, Joel stern( EVA guru); Zig Zigler; Mark de Rond (Cambridge Univ.); Partha Mohanram(Columbia univ.) , I mean forget India how many management grads worldwide can claim that.
As far as as accreditions go well a few months back seeing my ex-collegues from Ivy league i had the urge to pursue same abroad, so after a getting decent enuf GMAT score, out of curiousity called up (very early morning India time)Havards admission department….... and lo-behold….. since IMI Brussels is an international institute HAVARD RECOGNISES the IMI Degree given at the end of completion of IIPM program….. Dude who needed AICTE here….
Anyways on a personal front at IIPM I was CAMPUS Placed in the largest Korean MNC in electronics in India, they offered me the same package as they did to symbi grads and other b-school management trainees…
My second job (after a yr and half of the previous) was with Kuwait based MNC, The organisation is known as one of the most regular and the heaviest recruiters of IIMs, infact it fleeced with people from IIMs and havard. After rising to the position of being incharge of operations at regional level (India retail ops) (2 yrs later); Ive started my own business recently.
Infact it has the entreprenaurial course that any b-school offers (72 subjects in 2 yrs) in INDIA.
Yes, as I said it is the education that IIPM guarantees what you do with it…. is inur hands.
Regards
)
CR( as some one said… A fooled student
PS: IIPM is not a fly by night operator, its been existence since more than 30 yrs, more older than 99.99 % of Indian B-schools…. Now let me ask what is pedigree or authenticity of career 360 ...
IIPM is a clear case of exploiting the ignorance of students. They are one of the biggest education scams in India.
Sanjana, It is people like you who have to be blamed for the mess we are in. Agreed AICTE is bad. So do you mean that it has to be lawless, without eithics. Arindam Choudhary is a fraud and he continues to defraud bcoz of spoilt brats like you. The real sufferers are people from B and C towns, who dont have access to information. btw, why is IIPM and Bukingham silen to the latest revelation by Careers360
A very badly done article. I find your article very hollow at many points. You seem to have taken everything out of context presumably out of your coffee table journalistic habits. It’s surprising you’ve not written in your article that UGC and AICTE (the two Indian accreditation bodies) have been asked by the government to close down as the government has found them to be extremely corrupt. It’s also funny you don’t mention that the AICTE Chairman was arrested this month for corruption charges by the Central Bureau of Investigation
I think I’ll your article funny, rather than anything else. IIPM is a loud institution, of course, but at least it gets its job done. Funny you didn’t get any student’s response yourself
but referred to some site called Careers360 that seems to be set up to only do stories against IIPM
Funny, right?!
Hi,
sorry, but it is really a shame, that people are not used to read articles carefully any more. Otherwise also you would have realized, that there is lot more and different information than in the article from career360. And I was starting my reserach in 2007 - as you can see in the statement from Stanford.
Bärbel Schwertfeger
Though I find your article interesting, I find it almost completely based on career360! What is career360? Did you not get any responses from IIPM itself? Or did you try and just rewrite the Career360 article? I don’t want to criticise your efforts but I think it’s a very lopsided view of ivy league and top universities in the US and UK, of which I am a passout. Try and incorporate original views rather than google search
Cheers..
That was one of the best articles on a nationwide scam fooling thousands of innocent students… Keep going MBA-channel
Thanks,
Manjesh
I hope the alumni of the foreign universities take tyhis matter up with their respective universities to stop such misleading claims being handed out for a price. Othersise the value of their degree is as good as that of an IIPM graduate, which is the worst in India. Some one should take it up with University of Buckingham too. Please read the link below:
http://www.careers360.in/cover-story/iipm—yet-another-lie.html
The article highlights the false protocol the IIPM has followed over the years to attract students.Strangely this is the first authentic article I have come across which has criticized the IIPM.Media should expose the naked truth of the IIPM more often.They claim fake rankings(claim they are even higher in rankings than some of the IIMs), fake tie ups with international b schools and mislead young students in India.
Thanks for this article. I completely agree. They wanted to cooperate with us [Editor: Munich Business School] as well but after some checking and some inconsistend information from them, we decided to stay away.
Again, thanks, Elfi Stephenson